Benjamin
Cutter
On "would be"
American Composers
It was the writer's privilege some years ago
to converse with a past master in the art of musical instruction as the students
thronged through the corridors of a great school of music. A chance remark
became, as is often the case, a germ for thought; to which this present paper
owes its writing. "Who knows but some Schubert is now walking this
corridor!".
This idea fastened itself then in the mind of
the writer; and as the years passed by, bringing to him a close professional
acquaintance with the subject itself, it possessed him more and more, and to-day
it seems to him very probably that some Schubert is walking our streets, is
taking part in our musical lives, and yet has not come to his rights through
conditions beyond his power to control - some undiscovered genius that needed
only the right impulse at the right time and in the right way to blossom out
into a gift whose outgivings would gladden the hearts of future generations.
Musical Talents Taken in Time
That this is so suggests a fault somewhere in our scheme
of education, or a possible misuse of opportunity, or a failure to apprehend the
needs of that youth whose peculiar gifts fit him for musical composition. At any
rate, in comparing the musical training of the your in America with that of the
youth abroad, the first thing that appeals to one is the fact that the boy
abroad is ready to finish his education when the American boy is beginning his
theoretical studies. Abroad, a musical gift, a pronounced gift, is a thing that
is heeded; to state it in an un-ideal way, it is a business proposition; the boy
may become a composer, or that enviable thing, a conductor of operas, of
concerts; a money-earning notability. This gifted boy - say in some German city
- may be fortunate enough to have a wise parent, who places him at a very early
age in proper hands or takes the child to an authority and abides by his
counsel; the outcome is that while this child is in the lower or middle grade
schools he has already begun to study the piano and possibly the violin and,
what is more to our point, to study harmony.
Little by little the thing grows. In his twelfth or
thirteenth year, let us assume, he begins the study of counterpoint, and at the
same time the composition of little pieces. It is very likely that some
abatement in the stress of the regular school work is arranged fork, provision
being made for further study in later years, when the special musical training
shall have been completed. By his fourteenth year this boy writes music with the
ease and dispatch that a young school girl shows in her epistolary effusions;
but with this notable difference - that his productions show coherency, order,
design, the result of his regular training in giving to his thoughts both
structure an beauty.
Such a boy need be no over-strung delicate child. History
shows us quite the reverse. History shows us that these acquirements, having
been won little by little, have come to him naturally and without any
extraordinary effort. In his seventeenth year, or in his eighteenth, the hand of
this youth is penning symphonies. Postpone the time of beginning two years or so
- to eleven or twelve - and the outcome is about the same. The name of Richard
Strauss, who has stirred modern music so deeply, is the name of the one who
experience fits the above statement.
American Students Commence Too Late
Look about, now, in our American musical life and find, if
you can, the counterpart of this. The American boy, and the American girl - for
the American girl is to be reckoned with - both begin too late. And they both
begin too late not because of their own fault, but because their parents, while
providing for other kinds of education, have not understood what a musical
education demands, and have failed to heed the signs that one of these gifted
children may possibly show.
American parents cannot understand, for instance, what
makes a certain child so "queer." With no musical past of their own to
speak of, unacquainted with the conditions that would otherwise render them
knowing and discerning, they gaze on a boy who is distracted and absent, poor in
his school, ever scribbling tunes, moody, irritable, as a conundrum. Of the
creative impulse that is striving within him and that finds perhaps a vent in
arrangements of rag-time pieces, marches and little songs - the reflexes of what
he has already heard - they have no conception. They may encourage him in
practicing in this lower field of our art, but they are surely unaware that
rightly led, this holy impulse would soon be carried out and beyond the
vulgarity of rag-time music into the things that are better and higher, and that
this queer boy, poor in school though not necessarily poor in wit, the object of
the scorn of his successful brother scholars with their mater-of-fact minds
moving in the inherited channels of mathematics and the humanities, that this
same boy may have in him the germs of genius and undoubtedly possesses a gift
that developed, will lift him, other things being equal, to a high place in his
calling. They are unaware that such a boy, repressed, discouraged, may pass,
perforce, without interest through his school course, and with a sense of
derailment go through life, off his rightful track, out of his sphere, and
rankling and sore at heart. As the years go by the creative impulse will become
extinct. In its place will flow a wellspring of sorrow and bitterness that will
surge up afresh whenever the compositions of this or that more favored one are
heard.
Obstructions in America
This is no imaginary picture. To point to those who serve
as subjects for it would be easy. In New England, where the writer passed his
boyhood, the distrust of a musician's career, due to religious belief and ideas,
has had its part to play. Again, the sheer inability of parents to understand an
abnormal child. Again, the business sense of a parent = "too little money
in music."
The American youth, when he comes to study, comes late,
generally too late. His brain cells are no longer in their early plasticity and
impressibility. He learns; but it takes him long to learn, longer than it would
have taken some years earlier, because the channels of thought are now formed
slowly. When he should be writing in the larger forms, handling an orchestra,
dealing in its many colored tones, he is painfully and slowly wrestling with
that part of counterpoint that his more favored brother abroad learned with
comparative ease four years earlier.
Let us be understood. Certain men have begun late and have
even reached greatness. Witness Tschaikowsky who began when twenty-one; witness
Schumann. But they seem to have paid for it, Schumann never reaching the highest
point in form and Tshaikowsky becoming apparently a neurotic, as the hysteria of
his music betrays. The success of these men does not invalidate our contention;
that the youth of gifts who begins late so exhausts himself in the effort to
acquire technical proficiency that his Muse generally fails him when it should
really first begin to sing. Add to this the stress of starting in a profession,
the burden of a family that a young man may incur, and we have more reason why
so many young Americans of gifts have after a time of promise, even unusual
promise, fallen back into the rut of earning a living and have allowed their
gift to remain hidden, unused.
The Road To Mastery
The road to mastery in musical composition is a long one.
To go through it worthily means to possess an intellect of no mean order. The
requirements in the way of concentration, imagination and unflagging doing, are
fully equal to those made by the higher mathematics. But taken early and carried
along sensibly, the boy of gifts, of whom alone we write, learns his harmony in
two or three years' time, learns to handle chords, to harmonize tones, to
modulate. It is very likely that his gift prompts him to strike out on his own
account and to write little pieces or to arrange for orchestra. He next takes up
counterpoint, learning the so useful art of placing one melody against another,
without which all choral composition is defunct, and meanwhile is carried
through the so-called small forms for piano, piano and other instruments, voice.
This counterpoint, this long and severe part of the course, is where the
American is at his weakest, where he becomes exhausted, and where, when one
reaches down to the last analysis the great men of all time have been greatest -
Beethoven, Wagner, Bach, Strauss. In this pitting of one part against the other,
this interweaving of many voices to which modern music owes so much of its charm
and which is yet only a phase of technique, wholly subordinate to beauty of
melody - the life of all music - in this phase of his art the young American is
too little schooled. Instrumentation, the art of writing for the orchestra, and
the practice of the larger forms - overture, opera, symphony - conclude the
course.
The Opportunity of the American Boy
It is safe to say that the American boy is the equal of
that German or that French boy who is given this training and who stands it
because the course of work is pursued so leisurely and so rationally. Why the
young American has not done as much as his transatlantic brothers may be
apparent to the reader; it is not due altogether to a lack of gifts. In the next
two decades the growth of musical life in this country seems bound to produce
orchestral bodies in our larger towns and cities and that great thing in the
musical culture of a race, the good opera house. To cater to these needs, and to
the needs of American home music, should be the future of the young American
composer.
The Etude Magazine
November 1912